Defendant’s belief re: patent validity not a defense to inducement

In Commil Usa, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (Supreme Court 2015), the Supreme Court held that, because induced infringement and validity are separate issues and have separate defenses under the Act, belief regarding validity cannot negate Section 271(b)’s scienter requirement of “actively induce[d] infringement.” “When infringement is the issue, the patent’s validity is not the question to be confronted.” The Court pointed out the practical rationale that if accused infringers believe a patent being asserted against them is invalid, they have other, more appropriate mechanisms at their disposal to secure a ruling of invalidity, such as seeking ex parte reexamination of the patent by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, something Defendant Cisco did in this case.

Commil USA v Cisco Systems – US S.Ct. 2014 – D’s Belief re Patent Validity not Defense to Inducement

This entry was posted in Patents and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s